ext_75071 ([identity profile] schreibergasse.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] choco_frosh 2012-10-11 01:48 am (UTC)

Because it's 4025' tall (and therefore on the list for all us peakbaggers), but has no view or other redeeming features, and is REALLY long.
Think Hancock if the last bit was a little less steep, but the trail in was (a) not as nice, (b) mosquito-infested, and (c) twice as long.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting